This warning is essentially only triggered for ported vim functions.
It's unlikely that we'll refactor vim functions solely based on their
size since it'd mean we'd greatly deviate from vim, which is a high cost
when it comes to importing the vim patches. Thus, this warning only
serves as an annoyance and should be removed.
Add space around arithmetic operators '+' and '-'.
Remove space between back-to-back parentheses, i.e. ')(' vs. ') ('.
Remove space between '((' or '))' of control statements.
Add space between ')' and '{' of control statements.
Remove space between function name and '(' on function declaration.
Collapse empty blocks between '{' and '}'.
Remove newline at the end of the file.
Remove newline between 'enum' and '{'.
Remove newline between '}' and ')' in a function invocation.
Remove newline between '}' and 'while' of 'do' statement.
Problem: Cannot map <C-H> when modifyOtherKeys is enabled.
Solution: Add the <C-H> mapping twice, both with modifier and as 0x08. Use
only the first one when modifyOtherKeys has been detected.
https://github.com/vim/vim/commit/459fd785e4a8d044147a3f83a5fca8748528aa84
Add REPTERM_NO_SPECIAL instead of REPTERM_SPECIAL because the meaning of
"special" is different between Vim and Nvim.
Omit seenModifyOtherKeys as Nvim supports attaching multiple UIs.
Omit tests as they send terminal codes.
Keep the behavior of API functions.
* refactor: format with uncrustify
* fixup(dundar): fix functions comments
* fixup(dundar): remove space between variable and ++/--
* fixup(dundar): better workaround for macro attributes
This is done to be able to better use uncrustify rules for macros
* fixup(justin): make preprocessors follow neovim style guide
assert() is compiled out for release builds, but we don't want to
continue running in these impossible situations.
This also resolves the "implicit fallthrough" warnings for the asserts
in switch cases.
UBSAN with clang 10.0 is checking for adding offsets to a `NULL` pointer
which is not allowed. This is not yet checked in the version of clang
used in CI (7.0.0). I will work on cases of this so that tests passes
locally for me.
This could be tested in CI by either upgrading the clang of the
ASAN/UBSAN to 10.0, or add yet another CI target which builds with
clang 10.0.
Note: there are three changes to ascii_isident. Reverting first two (in
find_special_key and first in get_special_key_code) normally fails the new test
with empty &isident, but reverting the third does not. Hence adding `>` to
&isident.
Ref vim/vim#2389.
This way code will be easier to adapt to handling (partially) non-expressions
like :let lvalue part or :function definitions, and that would be needed in the
future both for proper completion support and for the Ex commands parser.
Dundar Goc